Sunday, November 29, 2015

WARNING RSO ACTIVISTS: Shaun Webb is the new T-Sand. Should I call him T-Shaun?

If there is a time I struggle with the idea of posting someone on this blog, it is when the troll is a Registered Citizen. Years ago, Clay Keys from Pensacola, aka "T-Sand," grew angry with the Anti-Registry Movement and started attacking activists and family members alike and teaming up with the likes of Absolute Zero United and Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst. Ultimately, T-Sand reoffended and is sitting inside a Florida prison for a 15 year sentence. Unfortunately, that was a time my bleeding heart backfired, because I tried to give T-Sand a chance. Recently I've had to deal with a similar situation. 

Shaun Webb is a registered citizen living in Michigan. He writes books (A Motion for Innocence, Behind the Brick, and Lost Youth) and hocks them on website like Amazon and attends book shows. He claims to be innocent, but he is currently convicted and listed publicly as a Tier 2. Shaun Webb first came approached me years ago, promoting his personal story. Now, I try to promote the works of those on the registry, even if their writing ability is a little lacking. In Shaun's case, there were glaring grammar and spelling errors, using the wrong word like "vial" (a container) instead of "vile" (something disgusting or bad). I didn't give it an Amazon review but on the insistence of fellow activists who I took at face value, I added it to my list of recommended reading. 

I should have known something wasn't quite right with Shaun when a few weeks after he sent me an electronic copy of his first book, he contacted me saying he heard I was sharing his book with people without his permission. I don't appreciate anyone accusing me of crap I didn't do, and so I stopped communicating with him. A year or so later, he apologized so I gave him another chance. 

Well, a couple of weeks ago, Shaun got upset over a trifling issue, a bad phone connection as the result of traveling while having a sinus infection. He blew up over a petty issue and TRYING to threaten me over the phone. So he eventually backed off for a week. As some of you might know, I've been extremely busy working on a number of issues and haven't been on the internet that much. Yet, Shaun sends a nasty email falsely accusing me of slamming his books. I had already explained to this paranoid fucker that no one can easily create multiple Amazon accounts, and up to this point, have never even had a Goodreads account. There were no new negative reviews in the week since Shaun decided to act like a douchecanal, so personally, the only place he could have received it was within his own mind. Once again, I was accused of things I did not do, from the same fat piece of shit that accused me of giving away free copies of his books, and I let him know how I felt about being falsely accused. He told me he would not bother me any more, but the next day, he sent harassing messages by text, claiming he was going to come to Cincinnati to beat my ass (something I hear from trolls all the time but never see actually happen).

Because Shaun Webb engaged in constant threats by phone and internet, as well as continuing to use my name and likeness to sell his lousy books, I removed my endorsements of his books from my website and Amazon, and posted a formal notice on my once Fallen blog that I no longer endorse, condone or support any of Shaun Webb's books. 

So Shaun Webb runs crying to Valigator:

Later, after I already warned him to stop further communication with me, he admits to being a "mole' for the other side:

Shaun Webb admitting to being a "mole." 

Since Shaun Webb has revealed his true colors to me, and continuously bashes me on the internet, even quoting "Encyclopedia Dramatica" as a valid source, I have been left with no other option than to feature Shaun Webb on this blog. 

I have asked Shaun Webb repeatedly to cease further communication with me and to stop using my name and likeness to promote his work. I also strongly suggest to you never accept an offer from him to review his work, because if you say anything at all about his work except a glowing five-star review, he will harass you to the ends of the earth. He was banned from Goodreads for that very reason. 

I guess even Val won't accept her new minion, by the way:

Shaun Webb has even stooped so low as to pretend to be a female reviewer on my book on Amazon. Coincidentally, T-Sand also had a habit of harassing folks while creating female profiles:

Shaun does such a lousy job of covering his tracks. I guess somehow I was supposed to be fooled by "Heather" who coincidentally has only reviewed Shaun Webb's books on Amazon:

And on Goodreads as "Marcie:"

Here he is attacking me once again on Goodreads, again quoting the same lame attacks.

He is trying to hide his recent attacks against me from other RSO activists in hopes you won't catch on to his behavior, but I have caught him slamming me numerous times. Here is his personal blog where he posted the same crap before he took it down (only after I filed a report against him):

The bottom line-- DO NOT accept the offer of a free book in return for a review, or you will regret it as I have. If he is willing to call someone who actually helped promote his sorry ass the P word and go crying to Valerie Parkhurst, then he'll do the same to you. DO NOT trust this fat piece of shit for anything. 

Sunday, November 1, 2015

New disgusting wannabe vigilante group desperately tries to bring back the death penalty

Apparently there is yet another scumbag wannabe vigilante group advocating the death penalty for those on the registry. This group is called "Sex offender Updates," and they are trying to push state-sponsored murder of registered citizens

At the moment, it is unclear who runs this shitty website. One of the cardinal rules for being an online wannabe vigilante, after all, is to hide in an anonymous hole like a coward. And any organization citing any of the other groups listed here, like Absolute Zero United or Evil Unveiled, is obviously an invalid resource. And guess what? Their address, Sex Offender Updates, 4733 Torrance Blvd., Suite 712, Torrance, CA 90503-4100, is a private PO Box rental company. 

Where the money goes: The "headquarters" of
Among their goals:

  • Keep the public updated about the sex offenders in their area
  • Create community networks of concerned, passionate and active citizens
  • ​Advocate for tough, appropriate laws governing sex crimes and offenders
  • ​Oppose efforts by sex offenders and their advocates to weaken laws and eliminate sex offender registries

So anyways, this group wants to repeal the US Supreme Court decision of Kennedy v. Louisiana, allowing execution of people convicted of sex crimes. Thankfully this has only gotten 178 shares. So much for this being unanimous. The only thing I can agree on is that Justice Kennedy used faulty reasoning by relying on what he felt was a "general consensus," but unlike Sex Offender Updates, I feel the problem was Kennedy relied on the consensus rather than the Constitution. 

To my knowledge, this Sex Offender Updates site isn't actively targeting anyone for now (though they have a few anti-RSOL articles up that are basically copy-paste jobs of old Evil Unveiled and AZU bullshit). However, I must raise awareness on this site because they are promoting violence against registered citizens:

Saturday, September 12, 2015

#OpDereksTears already admits defeat. Game Over!

A couple of weeks ago, Val's imaginary friend declared "#OpDereksTears", another lame attempt to try to ruin my life. Over the years, they've tried interfering in court cases, writing letters to my neighbors, a half dozen hate sites, 3 am phone calls, and following me around the Internet. I was hoping they would try something different this time, like an actual face-to-face encounter.

Quote: "'already anticipating failure' I think you could just look in the mirror if you need an example of failure, no? I'm currently dealing with a small number of unknown variables. The answer from one action will determine if there's a need for another. It's really not that difficult to understand. 'Harassing folks is not legal' I'm not harassing you. Telling the truth about someone/ something to another person is completely legal. Unless you'd like to cite some case law I'm not aware of. Your status as a registered *** doesn't give you blanket immunity from the consequence of your actions no matter how much you'd like to imaging (sic) that it does. I have absolutely zero interest in meeting you for any reason. Feel free to consider that as some kind of win. It's not like I'm overly concerned with the opinions of **** 'try something original this time' Why would I be doing anything else? This is the only communication you'll be receiving directly from me."

I suppose I should take a moment to address the bullshit. I asked her to try something original because they have tried and failed using the same routine. Ever played Madden football with someone who picks the Hail Mary every time he chooses a play? Well, this clown is just like that. Why ask for something different? Perhaps it is because ALL previous strategies have failed miserably. I assure you that the answer from will action will be failure, and the action from your next course of action will be failure. Your unknown variable are that it will fail, it is illegal, and you will be outed and subject to arrest, prosecution, and/or a civil suit. 

By the way, the registry warns folks against the misuse of registry info. There is also a number of laws against harassing anyone, not just registered citizens. If this person was indeed doing something heroic and legal, there would be no need to hide like a chickenshit. Oh, and just in case you wanted to read some statutes, there's THIS

Bottom Line: Barely a week passed and already they are admitting defeat! Once again, vigi-scum throws in the towel. I'm disappointed Vag's imaginary friend doesn't have the guts to meet me face to face but I'm not surprised it took the coward's way out again.

Just like all the previous operations, #OpDereksTears failed miserably. This was so lame, I didn't even get to cry tears of laughter.

#OpDereksTears is out in one punch.

Monday, August 31, 2015

Meet the LEAST anonymous "Anonymous" member, Sondra Mary Horne Whatley aka "Rebel Child" and other bullshit names

So it was recently brought to my attention that Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst's imaginary friend has been making some more idle threats against me. After I got off the floor from the excessive chortles brought on by the newest idle threat (a Hashtag Operation [#OpDereksTears] at that! Yeah, good luck with trying to make me cry, unless tears of laughter count LOLOLOL.

I believe that Val's "friends" on her shitblog are indeed just Val pretending to be interested parties, but there is a small chance that Val's new retarded friend is longtime troll Sondra Mary Horne Whatley of Lowndesboro, AL, aka Rebel Child, aka Narcissistic Bitch, aka AnonKittieKat or whatever Twitter account she's had to make up next, since she doesn't last long on Twitter. 

So who is Sandra? She's an annoying wannabe vigilante that is such a wannabe even Encyclopedia Dramatica has a page on her. Yeah, even other online vigi scum have distanced themselves from her. 

So here is a summary of Sondra from the asshats at ED (I will summarize it here so you don't have to give traffic to that shit site):

  1. Sondra tried attaching herself to Petra Luna and even claimed Petra Luna was going to turn over control to Petra's one man army to her. It never happened because Petra Luna's army consisted of just Petra Luna. 
  2. After getting blackballed by Petra Loony, Sondra made a number of online accounts to convince people she had her own 'army.' But like Petra Loony, Sondra's army was also an army of one. These are among the many names she has used on Youtube (some names she reused later on Twitter): 
  3. ConstipatedDiahrea, DurtyAnna16 (pretending to be a kid), GracieLuvsPink, HijackingReality, HollaBackGirlllllll, HuddleHouse247, hugzzzzzzz4u, iDontGivaSchitt, iHearCrazyVoices, lLoveNerds,  JimbosBaconDelivery, KarenWaIker, LilMissMeatyAnon, LiPsOFaANGEL14, MadeaPieceBeSteele, MzWonderWoman2U, NarcissticBitch, notwhiiic, OMGwtfSTFUwhore, 0pticalillusion, paulacandance, PleaseMakeMeStop, RebelChiId, RodBurchFan, ShaNaNaRules, TakingBackMyBrave, teenytinylittleme, THELMAandLOUISEroll, VanillaLiceLiceBaby, ViolateMyself,WAFFLEHOUSE2000, Warrior0nAWarpath, WarrioronAWarpath, WavesOfReaction, xxRebelChildxx, yourMAwarnedUaboutME, FearTheCougars
  4. Sondra used her own 14 year old daughter as bait to try to lure alleged online predators. It seems to have failed miserably. 
  5. Sondra is 42  48 years old, and still lives at home with her daddy.
  6. Her father is a card-carrying member of the KKK. Srsly.
  7. Sondra is addicted to painkillers.
  8. Sondra once married a man strictly for money.
  9. Sondra's breasts were made possible by her divorce settlement.
  10. Her favorite saying is "I WON'T BACK DOWN!".
  11. Claims to have "modeled", but can only produce pics of other models.
  12. Has an identical twin sister, who stole her husband, merely by being "not Sondra".
  13. Claims to be a "Psych Social Worker" when, in fact, she's unemployed.
  14. Is frequently seen prowling the tubes for young male members of Anonymous.
  15. Believes members of Anonymous will protect her.
  16. When cornered, Sondra will threaten with lolsuits.
At some point, this stupid cunt has taken her circus to Twitter, so add @AnonKittieKat and @AnonBitchIsBack. Well she didn't stay back for long, because both accounts are suspended. One of her Anonymous comrades is THIS GUY,  a schmuck who is actually a fan of Hitler. I'm not surprised. I've stated elsewhere on this blog that the "Antis" often carry banners of hate for other groups. Stitches 77 was a Skinhead, Valerie Parkhurst claims she supports the Sons of the Confederacy and attacks minorities online regularly, and here an Anonymous member is a Hitler sympathizer. 

Sondra also claims to have been involved with both AZU and Acme Cleaning Services, and when she first contacted me a few months ago she mentioned a woman who hasn't been involved with the Anti-Registry Movement in half a decade. So perhaps this crazy twat took some time off. But it seems she has possibly made a drinking buddy with Valigaturd. Considering the mention of my Twitter page and her recent Twitter "crusade," I do reasonably suspect at least the one anonymous troll who mentioned my Twitter page is Sondra. Since Sondra and Vag are both gun-nuts, it seems at least plausible that two dumb old broads shunned by other so-called "Antis" would find solace in each other. 

Addendum: It seems I ruffled a few feathers. Seems to me I'm on the right trail. The fact that Val's imaginary friend responded so quickly to this article tells me that Val & her imaginary friends spend all day sitting on the internet waiting for me to post something. Here is the response that was written on Val's shitblog:

This is too funny! First, apparently they are already anticipating failure. Heh. I'm sure plans B, C, all the way to Z will be a failure too :)

Second, nothing they've done so far is 100% legal. Harassing folks is not legal. Just because they haven't been arrested for it yet doesn't mean they are legit. That's obviously a main reason most internet vigilante scumbags go to great lengths to hide their identities. The only reason Valerie Parkhurst hasn't spent time in an Ohio prison yet is there is no evidence she ever sent letters to my neighbors, something she claimed to have done. Obviously Val is full of shit because if she was telling the truth, she would have been jailed. Again.

Third, I didn't "dox" anyone douchemissile, I merely reposted some info from a shit site since apparently Sondra, like Val, isn't well liked even among online vigi scum fucks. Nor did I say I was 100% sure Val's imaginary friend is Sondra. However the M.O. certainly doesn't eliminate Sondra as a suspect. But even if it isn't, it will just be another loser with a shaky mental health history and possibly a criminal record.

Fourth, "de-anonymizing" yourself is exactly the point! You hide like a coward and don't have the testicular fortitude to meet me in person so you hide behind a computer screen. If you don't "de-anonymize" as you put it, then you still lost the challenge.

I will be awaiting those updates LOLOLOL. By the way, try something original this time. I've already been doxxed (pointless since I post my info online anyways), had dozens of hate sites devoted to me, gotten the 3am phone threats, and neighbors supposedly got letters about me. There isn't much let you CAN do at this point besides do what you always do, make idle threats.

Here is an idea, come see me in person. That's the one thing you HAVEN'T done! Later, losers!

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Valigator and her imaginary friends have made me wait forever for their big surprise, yet they consistently fail to deliver

This is a very short post. The only reason I am writing this here is because Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst and her imaginary friend on her shit blog have continued making idle threats against me, and I challenged them to meet me in person. Obviously Val and imaginary friend won't do it. 

I'd like to remind Valerie and her imaginary friend of a few facts:
  1. I've gotten the same lame threat for years. Supposedly I'm supposed to have gotten a "big surprise" of some sort since 2008. I'm STILL waiting for this big surprise. Glad I never held my breath on that one.  Well, the asshole was right about one thing, I'd "never see him coming"... because he was afraid to show up! LOL.
  2. Valigaturd claims she wrote my neighbors letters a couple of years ago and they were up in arms, but when I asked all my neighbors about these alleged letters, not one neighbor received anything. Proof or it never happened!
  3. Valigaturd tried to make people think she went to Tallahassee to see me "crash and burn" at the Rally in Tally, and claims she only saw "four people" there. Obviously she wasn't there nor can she count, and since my counter-rally got equal attention with the Lauren Book walk, to make the claim my rally was a failure is to admit the Lauren Book bash was a failure. 
  4. The only time I can actually say Valigaturd actually tried sabotaging an event (the 2012 RSOL Conference in Albuquerque), it backfired miserably
So once again, Valigaturd and her imaginary friend is once again making implicit threats they can't back up. I will challenge them like I challenged that random Twitter twat that trash-talked me the other day-- SAY IT TO MY FACE OR DON'T SAY IT AT ALL. 

I know they won't accept because Valigaturd and her imaginary friend won't dare meet me in person. I will take it a step further. If the asshole who has been making idle threats since 2008 meets me in person, I'll fucking retire from the cause once and for all! I'll delete Once Fallen and all the useful info I have given to thousands of registered citizens. 

So what do you say, punks? Want to shut me up? Meet me in person. That's all you have to do. No more "anonymous" messages. You know where I live, so as we used to say back in the day, nothing separates us but air and opportunity. 

It has been seven years so it is time to put up or shut up.

ADDENDUM: Well it seems Valigaturd's imaginary friend has vowed to start "hashtag OpDereksTears" on me. Yawn. At least this time they will be giving their failed operation a name. Only tears I'll be shedding is tears of laughter from laughing at Val and her imaginary friend's rage after failing once again! ROFLMAFAO!!!!

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Stinson Hunter, bloody British vigi-wanker, has officially played his swan song

Kieren "Stinson Hunter" Parsons is getting ready to "grow his hair out and get a job"
Another online vigilante douchebag has officially called it quits, or as Stimpy said, playing his "swan song." Kieren Parsons, aka, "Stinson Hunter"  has claimed 30 arrests of "paedophiles" in the UK (though there are obvious questions as to the validity of his claims), but apparently he isn't making a lot of money trolling people on the internet. Apparently people were pissed he was begging for money-- Stimpy claims it was to see his kid, while critics contend he is lying to just con people out of a quick buck. Personally, I'm inclined to agree with the critics. Here is one such critical argument

This guy is a complete con. He's had us all (donators included) fooled. Had he of been truthful, maybe people wouldn't have a reason to question what he's been doing. I looked up to the guy a lot. I mean how do we know what we've donated has actually gone to him seeing his kid when his kid was already at home with him? The guy has a past that isn't exactly squeaky clean not to mention calling people names through his twitter and instagram but not so brave to say anything on facebook when he was called out. Anyone who questioned where the money went (donators or not) got removed, comments deleted or blocked but will happily sit on twitter belittling folk and making idol threats like they're something he scraped off the bottom of his shoe. Even some of his own family members have commented about their concerns about his habits and lies. All this talk of 30 convictions in 6 years and only 10 of them were put behind bars says a lot when the rest have been living ruined lives because of his mistakes. What has he really done for us parents that we haven't done for our own kids? From the day and hour our kids were born, it's been "us" protecting them, not him. I have lost all respect for the kid! He needs to sort his life out and get a job. Both him and her. We've all had our struggles and more severe cases than this. He thinks he's worse off than the rest of the world. Begging is not the answer for his next hit!

After I posted the last article about Kieren "Stinson Hunter" Parsons, my message board was flooded with a couple dozen threatening or derogatory "anonymous" comments from either Parsons or one of his lackeys. Of course, I couldn't give two shits about this bloody wanker and he can go choke on an Irish banger for all I care (obviously he isn't going to cross the pond to beat my ass so I'm not worried about censoring my disdain for this piece of shit.) 

There are other similar comments so I'll just summarize what I've read from the flood of comments. Apparently, ol' Stimpy collected upwards of $30k from a kickstarter campaign (more specifically, 32,661 British Pounds, the equivalent of $51,044 USD) under the guise of making an independent documentary and yet a couple of weeks ago, he was begging for yet more money from the losers who watch his online shenanigans, this time under the guise of needing to see his son. People started asking legitimate questions about where all this money disappeared to and why he's asking for yet more money to see a kid that lives with him, and he was being very evasive, even downright nasty to those supporters asking questions. After all, if the equivalent of $50,000 or so isn't enough to make a film and have enough to make ends meet, then obviously something is amiss.

Apparently, after the barrage of questions from soon-to-be EX-supporters of this shady, unsavory online vigi-scum, Stimpy is packing up his toys and crying home to mommy. This bum is going to get a real job, presumably as a dirt farmer or night janitor. All I can say is good riddance to bad rubbish.

Stinson Hunter plans to "vanish" after online dispute over cash
15:22, 14 JULY 2015
Nuneaton paedophile-hunter now says he plans to move away from stings and setups

Stinson Hunter says he plans to “vanish” and have some time to himself after he was abused online for asking for money.

The 33-year-old paedophile hunter from Nuneaton made a desperate plea to his Facebook followers for a small amount of cash this week so he can go to Norfolk and visit his baby son.

And while he did receive enough money to make the trip he was also attacked by some Facebook followers who accused him of sponging.

Hunter, now living in Lancashire, told the Telegraph that the latest online fracas is “the final straw” and he is now planning to take a step back from his work.

“I’ve got something planned, a one-off event, in the future,” he said.

“That’s my swan song. After that I’m going to take some time for myself.

“I’m going to grow my hair, look for a job and just vanish for a bit. That’s the plan.

“That’s where I am. I just want to focus on doing stuff for myself for a bit. My Facebook will still be ticking over but it will change.”

Hunter, whose film won a Bafta earlier this year, drew a mixture of criticism and support from his Facebook followers when he asked for money to go and look after his son after his former partner Kirsty fell ill.

In an emotional post Kirsty then wrote that Hunter was struggling financially.

She wrote: “He puts on an incredibly brave face for the public and I don’t know how, I couldn’t manage to do it, behind that incredibly brave front is a broken man right now, he can barely even afford food let alone bills or to even see his own son.

“He battles with depression every single day and it saddens me so much that I can’t even help with it, I don’t want to see his tears or hear him cry anymore.

“All he needed was that little extra support from the public when he really needed it most, all he wanted was to see his little boy and to help me out.”

Hunter then wrote later on: “For over six years I have been trapping paedophiles and have achieved over 30 convictions.

“Not once have I ever been paid for this.

“The nature of my work and my profile make it virtually impossible to get a regular job, yes that was my decision but I stand by it.”

Speaking to the Telegraph he added: “I’m not on benefits. I could claim Job Seekers Allowance but I don’t – I choose not to.

“If people saw my outgoings they would be surprised. I do my best to manage each month.

“But I’m sitting here right now selling my stuff off on eBay so I’m not going to be homeless in three months' time.

“I went to London recently and that 10-minute speech cost £300.

“I’m going to seal myself off now and take some time to get my life in order. That’s the main thing, to have time for me and my son.”

Hunter said that he did manage to raise £200 to pay for train tickets and a small amount more which he plans to put towards getting his driving licence and a car.

On Facebook he wrote that he was keen to go into education and go “beyond the stings and setups”.

“Nothing lasts forever,” he added.

As an aside, a guy who hit Stimpy with a car got his sentenced reduced. Hell, the guy should have gotten a medal for running over this POS. 

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

The "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!" Facebook group obviously has a problem with balls

Apparently there is a "branch" of the retarded No Peace For Predators group, and this branch may even be dumber than the original No Peace For Predators. This group is called "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!

Here is a prime example of their stupidity. Apparently there is a book on called, "Do You Want To Play With My Balls"? It is a crude adult humor book full of double entendres about "balls" (here is a YouTube reading of it, if you are curious). Kid's book parodies are nothing new (the most well-known at this time is probably "Go The Fuck To Sleep," with the audio version read by Samuel L. Jackson) but apparently this humor book did not elicit any laughs from the idiots at NPFP-FloriDUH. 

So one of the regular posters made a Facebook post about this book to "warn" others of this book. Another member responded, "The author and the publishing company should be sued for such non sense. In fact I think I will contact my lawyer in behalf of all our children." Another said, "I can't comprehend why people think it's ok to do or expose such perverted things and think there will be no later consequences." Still another said, "as an adult with more experience it's obvious the meanings of the book and as a survior (sic) of molestation of 18+ guys, I'm incredibly offended by this book and the use of the little girl." "It should be plainly posted as adult only. Further more it should be band from being published. Only sick minded people find it amusing. Hince the point of this site." And, "What a horrible book! No WAY this was written without malice. I better NEVER see this in a children's library section or the please be quiet rule will not be followed! Disturbed freaks of nature."

It should be noted the attorney they contacted told them, as relayed by one member of NPFP-FloriDUH, "it would[n't] be prudent to try and sue the writer or the publishing company due to freedom of speech laws. And freedom to publish ones opinion. As bad as it may be there are far worse things published under those laws." [Screenshot of this exchange will be posted st the end of the article due to length. 

If that wasn't enough, the members flooded the Amazon page with negative reviews. Here are a few of their crazy reviews:

0 of 2 people found the following review helpful
1Though the "humor" in this book may have been intended for adults, it still endangers children
ByMichael Welperon June 19, 2015
Format: Hardcover
It is wrong to present this material in the format of a children's book. I understand that this book was written for adults, but that doesn't mean that it couldn't end up in the hands of a child. Children deserve to be protected. No moral adult would ever present such disgusting material in a way that could potentially appeal to an innocent child. And more seriously--yes, I do understand that this book was not intended to aid pedophiles, but a very sick adult could take advantage of the opportunity it yields, nonetheless.

0 of 5 people found the following review helpful
1i wish i could give this horrible book less then 1 star
ByTamaraon June 14, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
i wish i could give this horrible book less then 1 star. It s so disgusting i would neve ever read this to my kids. who wrote this book must have been a pedophile

1 of 6 people found the following review helpful
1Not a child's book - read it on youtube before you buy...
ByPro-Life Nobamaon June 7, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
NOT A CHILDREN'S BOOK. Not sure what adult would write this or why (pedophile, gay activist or just a gag). Go hear it read at Youtube and decide for yourself.

Out of all the retarded comments, the comment below is the dumbest comment of all:

1 of 7 people found the following review helpful
1Pornography for 2 year olds
ByVivian Aldanaon June 6, 2015
Format: Kindle Edition
This is in NO WAY an innocent book. Do You Want to Play With My Balls is a manual for pedophiles. Perhaps some INNOCENT PERVERT will read it to your child. They can inform your child or grandchild about Blue balls, licking balls, holding a persons ball sack, hairy balls, or squeezing a persons balls, ???? Innocent--Really???? NO, not innocent--IT IS PERVERTED! It is pornography for 2-year olds.

Perhaps we should sent the morons at this branch of NPFP a care package. Maybe some of Chef's Chocolate Salty Balls? Maybe a case of Ben & Jerry's Schweddy Balls? How about an LP of AC/DC's "Big Balls"? Or, perhaps the complete works of Honore de BALZAC?

Apparently this will be the next book on NPFP-FL's shitlist
Actually, instead of balls, we need to send everyone at "No Peace For Predators Florida! Protect Our Children!" a case of BRAINS. 

Monday, June 22, 2015

Valerie Parkhurst is "a different kind of predator"

Once again, Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst, career criminal now residing in Ft. Lauderdale FL, has been caught in a lie and completely embarrassed and humiliated. 

So here is the latest "Valigator PWNED" story -- A friend has written a new book, a true crime book entitled "Lost Youth: A True Story." [From the website: "Amazon bestselling Author Shaun Webb’s sixth full-length work, and second true crime study, Lost Youth: A True Story, delves into a fateful October 1981 night in Waterford, Michigan that rocked a quiet family’s peace and shook an entire community to its deepest emotional depth. Colette Molyneaux, 13, a cute, healthy and happy teenager, paid the ultimate price in a criminal’s horrible thirst for blood.  Nancy Molyneaux, Colette’s mother, also suffered enormously, enduring the violent act of rape on top of losing a dear daughter. Who was responsible for these monstrous crimes?  Why did such a bright light and friendly young lady have to be extinguished so brutally?  More to the point; what factors could have possibly contributed to the awful situation?"]

I have a copy and it will be my travel book as I prepare to travel to another public demonstration. 

In the meantime, those with a head start in reading the book has already posted reviews. One review was fairly critical of Shaun's book, so Valigator thought she would use that opportunity to start talking trash. Val responds to the critical review trashing the author and claiming that spoke with the critical reviewer (Val claims the critical reviewer called him a "jerk.") I found the comment and responded to Val and informed the author of what Val claimed. The reviewer was also notified of this claim. Val responded to my comment to making a claim that I am gay (which is odd considering Val once told an online poster she was a lesbian). 

The author of the critical review posted a response to Val's claims that she was contacted by Val. She stated she "do[es] not appreciate people highjacking my review for their own agenda. Nor do I appreciate mr. Webb being told I've had a conversation with anyone when all you did was comment on this post."

She follows up by saying, "In my mind that shows your are a different kind of predator."

Within a couple of hours, Valerie Drunkhurst deleted her comments and went into hiding (I'm sure once she restocks on "liquid courage," she'll be back to her usual bullshit. It is fun, however, to see Val caught in a lie and run for the hills, proving once again Val is a bullshit artist. 

Sadly, I was not home to screenshoot the exchange before Val deleted her shitty comments. However you can see the other comments on Amazon. 

Val--[This comment was deleted by the author on June 20, 2015]

Valigator is Valerie Parkhurst, a career criminal residing in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. She has multiple arrests for aggravated assault and gun violations, a fact easily verified by visiting the Broward Co. FL Clerk of Courts website. She has been harassing Mr. Webb for years and already had her account flagged for her barrage of attacks. Reader beware.

Val--[This comment was deleted by the author on June 20, 2015]

I know mr. Webb and have already been informed. I do not appreciate people highjacking my review for their own agenda. Nor do I appreciate mr. Webb being told I've had a conversation with anyone when all you did was comment on this post. In my mind that shows your are a different kind of predator.

Hey Val. Where'd you go? Not fun getting caught in your lie is it? So ashamed that you erased your comments. You're nearly 70 Val. ..act like your age!

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Three vigilante thugs try to burn down apartment building to go after registrant, kills elderly woman instead

Here are three more of Valerie Parkhurst's "heroes," burning down an entire apartment building just to go after a sex offender.

2 suspects go to Troy in fatal arson
2 waive extradition, 3rd to have hearing in North Carolina
By Kenneth C. Crowe II
Updated 9:45 pm, Monday, June 8, 2015
Val's Hero #1: Abbey Slaga

Two of the three suspects in the fatal May 1 arson have waived extradition from North Carolina while the third will have a hearing next week on returning to Troy, a spokesman for Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel Abelove said Monday.

The three are charged with first-degree arson for allegedly setting the fire, which authorities now believe caused the death of Gladys Halpin, 82.

Halpin was rescued from the 520 Second Ave. apartment building fire, during which she suffered a heart attack. Firefighters were able to revive her and get her to the hospital. She died May 23 at Bay State General Hospital in Massachusetts. Final autopsy results have not yet been released.

On Sunday, David Stanley, 22, of East Greenbush, was arraigned in City Court and sent to the jail without bail, police spokesman Capt. Daniel DeWolf said. He had previously waived extradition in North Carolina before being brought to Troy.

On Monday, Tyler Smith, 24, formerly of Castleton, waived his extradition at a hearing in Raleigh, N.C., and will be back in Troy by the end of the week, said Jonathan Desso, a spokesman for Abelove.

Abby Slaga, 21, of East Greenbush, did not waive extradition because she wanted to consult with an attorney, Desso said. Slaga's hearing will be June 16 in Franklin County, N.C. She will continue to be held on a fugitive from justice warrant in the Franklin County Jail without bail.

Stanley, Slaga and Smith were arrested last week by Raleigh police and Franklin County deputies on fugitive warrants issued in Troy. City detectives took part in the arrests.
Val's hero #2: Tyler Smith

DeWolf said detectives would return to Raleigh to bring back Smith.

According to Stanley's arrest report and criminal complaint, at least two people have given statements to police about what they saw and heard that night.

Those witnesses said Monday that the three defendants and a man who lived on the second floor of 520 Second Ave. had a feud over money that was apparently stolen from the tenant.

"They spray painted 'Rapo' on his door and on the building," said one witness who did not want his name used. "He was a Level 1 sex offender, we were told, but it sounded to me like they were arguing over money. I could smell the gasoline they used to set the fire outside his door."

The target of the flames was convicted of a sex crime in 2004, officials said.

Another witness said she had just come home from work that night and heard the argument and went to see what was going on.

"Then I saw the whole building just go 'boom' and saw the three people run out the door, one on fire. I then rushed around to make sure everyone was getting out."

Smith had been out of state prison for just a week before he allegedly took part in setting the fatal fire, according to authorities and New York state inmate records. He had been in prison for attempted burglary in Rensselaer County.

The three fled to the home in North Carolina of a relative of one of the suspects.

Officials said all three were friends and Slaga was involved in a romantic relationship with one of the men, but they did not specify which one.

Officials declined to say how the fire was set.

A video from the night of the fire appeared to show three people fleeing the building at 520 Second Ave.

The fire spread to neighboring 518 Second Ave. next door. Both buildings were heavily damaged and are now boarded up.

The investigation continues, and authorities have not ruled out additional charges.

The May 1 fire has not been linked to an earlier string of 13 fires set in Lansingburgh between July 2014 and February 2015, police said.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst gets called out for her lack of reading comprehension, then she plays fast and loose with the truth

Valerie Parkhurst aka Valigator, the career criminal now residing in Ft. Lauderdale, FL, is at it again. Earlier this year, AZUnites exposed Val's fraudulent GoFundMe campaign, as well as highlighted her admittance of using confirmation bias in her articles. 

Now, Val has continued the latest campaign of character assassination on her poorly designed, unreadable blog. 

In Valerie Parkhurst's personal obsession with me, she stumbled upon a Master's thesis written in 2011 and posted on the Kansas university scholarly works website. I never knew it existed, personally, but unlike Parkhurst, I'm not so obsessed with Derek Logue, I feel the need to constantly Google myself to see what people are writing about me. Val has a penchant for posting on comments Anti-Registry Movement activists have made as far back as 2009 in an attempt to start a fight. I guess she does not realize that rarely does one read comment sections of articles older than three days, so this strategy of hers does little but waste her time. But if she thinks leaving her droppings on a comment board from 2009 is the way to attack us, more power to her, I guess. 

This will be the only time anyone actually reads shit from her blog. 
So anyways, Val posted this 2011 thesis and proclaimed, "Seems this researcher put Derek Logue (like the bug he is) under glass and had not so glowing reviews about this freak. Funny thing after all these years, Derek doesn't link (anywhere) to this observation about him.."

Master's Theses are rarely published publicly, and when they are, they are not easily found, nor do researchers tend to notify people they are citing works beforehand. The researcher obviously obtained a copy of the Once Fallen eBook as part of his research. Thus, I was never aware of the research paper.

Somehow Valerie Parkhurst thought the article was attacking me much to her delight but the actual article was actually a discussion about how the myths of the American sex offender has negatively impacted the ability of the scientific community to effectively study strategies for reducing sexual abuse. The abstract of the article states the following: 

Sex offenders are the subjects of a discourse suggesting that they are “brutish, disgusting, primitive freaks” who are destined for recidivism. This discourse has provided the rationale for myriad laws designed to control sex offenders. However, these well-intentioned laws create negative outcomes for both sex offenders and society. This paper examines dominant sex offender discourse and discusses evidence that contradicts the prevailing assumptions about sex offenders. In so doing, it questions the efficacy and benefit of current sex offender laws and suggests alternative ways the U.S. can address the problem of child sexual abuse. -- p. iii

In regards to Gray's discussion of Once Fallen, I've included every instance below where Derek Logue/ Once Fallen is discussed in his research paper, entitled, "DEVIANCE AND DISCOURSE: CHILD MOLESTERS IN THE UNITED STATES" -- 

"Derek Logue operates a Web site called that advocates for sex offender rights and legislation reform, as well as provides resources for sex offenders after they have been released from incarceration. Derek Logue has also self-published a book about his crime. It is appropriate to use his real name because he is a public figure and his status as a sex offender is public knowledge. Derek’s inclusion in this essay will not reveal any information not already available from other sources." -- p. 11

"Derek Logue, a sex offender who became an activist for sex offender rights, says that sex offenders experience more physical harassment than suggested by Levenson and Cotter’s study. Logue’s assertion is anecdotal, but it is based on his personal experience and activism on behalf of sex offender rights. He argues that offenders are reluctant to report physical altercations out of fear police will blame them for instigating the fight. Logue also points out that sex offenders prefer to “fly under the radar” and avoid unnecessary dealings with law enforcement. It is difficult to judge the validity of Logue’s assertion based on Levenson and Cotter’s study, as the researchers were not affiliated with law enforcement. However, since the study was conducted in court-mandated counseling sessions, it is possible that the offenders worried that their interviews could eventually come to the attention of law enforcement. At least some people express a willingness to harm sex offenders, so it is possible Derek is correct." -- p. 37

"The social isolation, loss of civic identity, and lack of hope is thought to contribute to the risk of recidivism in sex offenders (Robbers 2009:11). Derek Logue expressed the same sentiment during my interview with him. He also wrote about it in his book Once Fallen (Logue 2009:4): “This label [registered sex offender] carries with it a ‘social death sentence’; sex offenders are considered the scourge of society, deserving of death, castration, concentration camps, and torture.” There are not any legal provisions allowing for the torture of sex offenders. Logue is reflecting his personal experience as a sex offender, which seems like civil or social torture to him. His past interferes with his current life. Finding gainful employment was a challenge: “During the next couple of months, I would face rejection after rejection after rejection. I tried offices, manual labor jobs, even fast food, to no avail.” (Logue 2009:24). He cannot live with his girlfriend or spend the night at her house because she has a minor son. (This may seem to be a common sense restriction, but Logue’s crime was against a female. Child molesters often have gender preferences.) Logue has even considered suicide." -- p. 42-43

This is hardly an attack on Derek Logue or Once Fallen, much less against the Anti-Registry Movement in general. In fact, Grey concludes that while he feels most existing laws should still be used to some extent (except residency restrictions) the laws should not apply to all offenders, and serious reforms need to be made to the dialogue regarding sex offender conversations. 

"If lawmakers and officials begin to counter the child molester rhetoric, some of the problems associated with sex offender laws might be alleviated." -- p. 77

"Not only must lawmakers and officials work to change the tone of the conversation about sex offenders, they must acknowledge that the legal system is overwhelmed with the requirements of sex offender control." -- p. 80

"There are alternative strategies for treating sex offenders with low-risk profiles and managing them in the community." -- p. 81

"Whatever reforms are implemented, the way forward will require courageous lawmakers to lead sober conversations that replace “tough on crime” rhetoric with honest evaluations of the effectiveness and essential fairness of the nation’s sex offender laws. A just society cannot tolerate the legal creation of a persistent underclass. Unfortunately, none of the current or recommended strategies prevents molestations in the first place. This remains a difficult area to address. It is impossible to remove risk entirely from children’s lives. My informant, Marshall, has a realistic perspective on the problem: “But I don’t know how effective the laws are in preventing what it is that they want to prevent. I think that the best prevention is good parenting. At the same time, you just can’t prevent some things." -- p. 82 

So now that I happily pointed out to Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst her error, she cranked up her BS meter to a higher level. She added an addendum to her shit-post, claiming, "Seems to Derek, he thinks this paper is an affirmation of his worthless positions and accuses me of interpreting it incorrectly. I personally think the guy is a hack, but his description of Logue and his background (""Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers (Logue) had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods"""" (Bouvier 2003:446)."

So NOW Val thinks the researcher is a "hack" now that I made her realize that he is in favor of sex offender reforms. Not only that, but Val felt the need to play fast and loose with the written word by ADDING words into the article to make it sound like the researcher is attacking me. 

The actual article that Val claims is attacking me says this:

With a screenshot for added measure
"Though the mechanism that links past molestation with future crime is poorly understood, the study found that other factors in the victim’s history—like poor adult supervision, violence at home, or being abused by a female—were correlated with an increased risk of becoming an abuser. Additionally, one out of three victims who became abusers had a history of being cruel to animals in their childhoods (Bouvier 2003:446)." -- p. 15

Nowhere does the article associate that statement with Derek Logue/ Once Fallen. Val felt that if she added that one word in there to associate me with with a random statement she can somehow salvage the lie she stated by posting this research paper rather than admit that she does not know how to read a college-level report. 

Misreading advanced reading material is something Valerie Parkhurst tends to do on a consistent basis. In fact, I recently called her out on another bogus claim she made on her blog:

Not only did she credit the bogus 52% study to the wrong guy, she took it a step further by posting THE WRONG REPORT on her shit-blog. 

Apparently, when Valerie Parkhurst stated back on her shit-blog on January 4, 2015, "But I, as usual, look for data/opinions/conclusions that re-enforces my position on the issue and as predictable isnt (sic) hard to find," apparently she was lying about these studies being hard to find. But why point out the truth when you can just made things up and post it online, as Parkhurst and her online cohorts has been prone to do? After all, many people don't want to read an 82-page article, they want the Cliff Notes version. 

If Val ever decides to sell a 'Val's Notes" you better demand a refund. 

That pesky confirmation bias. 

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Man behind Facebook page that named and shamed child sex offenders has a string of indecency convictions himself

Anytime I come across an online hate page on Facebook, I can't help but to wonder how many of them have criminal records (we all know David Rowe from No Peace For Predators has a record, as does Valerie "Valigator" Parkhurst). 

Here is another hypocrite running another anti-Registrant FB page.

Man behind Facebook page that named and shamed child sex offenders has a string of indecency convictions himself

A self-appointed moral guardian who set up a Facebook page to name and shame convicted child sex offenders has a string of convictions for indecency himself.

'Paedophile hunter' Joseph McCloskey (39) has been exposed as a career criminal with a total of 96 previous convictions, including four for indecency, as well as a host of others for drugs - including supplying Class A drugs - public order and road traffic offences.

The Limavady man's 23-year criminal career emerged yesterday when he appeared at Londonderry Magistrates Court charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm in the city centre on September 20 last year. He pleaded guilty to the assault and was released on bail, and will be sentenced on June 12.

McCloskey's record of offending averages four convictions a year.

He was at the centre of a legal storm earlier this year when he and social media giant Facebook were successfully sued by a sex offender who had been identified on a page, Keeping Our Kids Safe From Predators 2, operated by McCloskey.

The courtroom victory provoked a storm of outrage on McCloskey's behalf after the exposed paedophile was awarded damages. Mr Justice Stephens said that McCloskey's Facebook site "was an attempt to hunt a sex offender, to drive him from his home and to expose him to vilification".

The child abuser, identified in court only as 'CG', claimed harassment, violation of his right to privacy and breaches of the Data Protection Act against Facebook and McCloskey after his photograph and details appeared on the site in 2013.

A string of abusive comments and information on his location appeared. One user called for CG to be hanged, while others advocated shooting or castrating him.

One of the posts stated: "I would tie him to a tree and put a blowtorch where he wouldn't want it."

The abuser claimed his fear of violence being inflicted on him was heightened by one of those posting on the page being a former UDA commander who forced him to flee in a past attack on his home.

In evidence, CG also claimed he has been threatened with being thrown off a pier during a fishing trip, hounded out of a cinema and had to use a supermarket trolley to fight off another tormentor.

"He (McCloskey) took pride in driving an individual out of his home," Mr Justice Stephens said, and "knowingly encourages harassment of sex offenders by other individuals by the comments he makes and by the aim and purpose of the profile/page."

Both Facebook and Mr McCloskey were held liable for misuse of private information, with a further finding against the page operator for unlawful harassment.

The judge awarded £20,000 damages against McCloskey and Facebook, with McCloskey being liable for £15,000 of that sum.

Both McCloskey and Facebook are appealing against the ruling.In a further twist, the child abuser who successfully sued McCloskey and Facebook was himself then sued by two of his victims in a bid to secure compensation for abuse they suffered.

The abuse victims' lawyers secured a High Court injunction halting any payout to the sex offender following his landmark action against the social networking giant.

Lawyer Michael Redmond, of Doris & MacMahon Solicitors, acted for one of the victims.

He said: "Our client was extremely concerned and annoyed on hearing that the person who had been convicted of abuse was due to receive a significant amount of compensation."

Experts say it's almost impossible to check the bona fides of anyone operating a Facebook page,.

According to social media expert Dr Kevin Curran, Reader in Computer Science at Ulster University, there is nothing to stop anyone setting themselves up as an online vigilante on Facebook - no matter how shady their past.

"It's an open door, really," Dr Curran said. "A Facebook page can be set up by anyone at all. There are no barriers."

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

If these online vigilante groups are "heroes," then why do they have to host their operations overseas

Here is a thought I've had before. It is obviously okay in America for people to harass Registered Citizens, as message boards are filled with the same tired comments.

But over the years, members of online vigilante douchebag groups like AZU have often posted their shit overseas because websites like Youtube actually have some degree of standards and it is possible to have hateful videos removed (although Facebook allows far more hate groups to routinely post murder discussions on their websites). Now, given the fact that it pretty much takes a court order to have anything removed from various websites, and given the acceptance of harassing and slandering registered citizens online, it is obvious that so-called "Antis" need to send their trash overseas because even the average American doesn't want to deal with them.

The bad news for those who have been negatively impacted by "Evil-Unveiled" are being victimized again because the defunct Evil-Unveiled info, already a project plagiarized from the earlier Perverted-Justice trash project Wikisposure, has now been reposted on another garbage site called "Encyclopedia Dramatica," another internet filth site run by internet trolls and other assorted  losers.

Now, while Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a site to be taken seriously by any means (it is a site created "for the lulz" meaning its only purpose is to make fun of and hurt people), some assholes at ED have decided to "archive" the Wikisposure/Evil-Unveiled tripe "as part of a lulz preservation project," as the cowards at ED proclaim.

Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted overseas of course, and claim to be under Ukrainian jurisdiction, though having the .se extension. ED has a pretty shitty reputation, and they are pretty hypocritical considering they are re-posting and promoting the inaccurate Evil-Unveiled website and yet they are promoting rape and molestation:

This is actually quite typical of internet troll groups. After all, I've covered the hypocrisy often on this website. I wouldn't doubt many current members of ED are actual sex offenders like T-Sand.

Of course, that means little to the dozens of Anti-Registry Movement reformists who have been continuously slandered by the lies started by Perverted Justice and continue to spread like a disease. And there is little that can be done about it except to consider the source. Encyclopedia Dramatica isn't exactly a site known for accurate info. In fact, they freely admit their site isn't about the facts.

I doubt there IS much any of you impacted by having this info can do, save gong to court in a foreign nation, but perhaps you can file a suit against the the big search engines, especially Google, to have the links buried. Maybe someday, I'll catch one of these trolls in person. You'd be amazed how weak these people are in real life, just like the typical bully.

But, obviously even the trolls know that they are doing something wrong, because they go to great lengths to conceal their identities and posting their harassment outside the reach of American courts. There is nothing heroic about that.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Exposing a couple of "Shoalanda Speaks" members

A few years ago, I was targeted and threatened by the anonymous scum from a trashy Alabama blog called 'Shoalanda Speaks." It seems their obsession with me hasn't stopped long after I moved to Ohio, as they continue to blog about me. And now, one of the douchebags who works at the blog attacked me on a recent OpEd I was featured in at (of course, career criminal Valerie Parkhurst was there too but that's par for the course). 

One of my favorite things to do is exposing online scum like the ones who work at Shoalanda Speaks. They have been mostly anonymous but every now and then, they slip up. 

(By the way, for those unaware of what a "Shoalanda" is, there is a local interest blog in Muscle Shoals, AL called "Shoalanda Speaks," run by a few gossipy losers with nothing better to do than complain about how much the Shoals area sucks. In other words, just another group of anonymous cowards afraid to show their faces online, so they fit in with the rest of the scum I feature on this blog.) 

Apparently, Kathryn Sperry-Wheeler created an account just to attack me, but added her Facebook page to her account. I guess she must have thought I wasn't going to think to click the link, but I did.  Interestingly enough, she also participates in a Facebook page called "Larry Stutts is a quack." This is the same Senator who is pushing SB 272, a bad bill that could allow for really young kids to land on the registry. Texas registers 10 year old kids, so I guess Alabama wants to play, "Me too!" Gee, I wonder if she'll support the senator on this bill? What an idiot!

And, Kathryn made a new account just to attack me. LOL!
Speaking of idiots, Ed Truitt was already exposed as part of the Shoalanda Speaks out of her ass blog. I just never got around to mentioning him until now. He's been in hiding as of late after someone at the old Times Daily site exposed his identity. I wonder how he felt upon discovering that his contact Clay "T-Sand" Keys was busted for CP in Pensacola? It must have been embarrassing for the Shoalanda Speaks blog, knowing they aligned themselves with a criminal recidivist just to attack someone who has not been rearrested. 

Shoalanda speaks of vigilante violence. 

The reason I haven't forgotten Trollanda and fiends isn't even personal. It is because of stuff like the above post. People like Kathryn and Ed and Valerie are the TRUE monsters. They project their hatred to a socially accepted target to feel better about their miserable lives. I'm curious how many criminals besides T-Sand Shoalanda has worked with over the years? 

Someday, when I have nothing important to do, I may take the time to expose the identities of every member of Shoalanda Speaks. In the meantime, I have a bill to kill and a Rally in Tally. Later!